Shield) rein lieu of a harness. However, Cybex states the side impact final rule did not consider CRSs that use a forward restraining surface. Cybex argued that the 25-degree dummy arm positioning required in the new FMVSS No. 213a standard could not be met hinein forward facing CRSs with restraining https://namejoke0.werite.net/an-unbiased-view-of-fresh-seat-belt-webbing-safety-restore